People don’t know what and where to touch to use it.People only used it to get arrivals time information.Many people wouldn’t notice if it could be used (or interacted).And, the interaction is not the same over time.īefore I did my observation, my assumptions were: You are triggered to do something, you think, then you do the action. This gives you the interactivity, because you (or the user) communicate with this installation. The more people interact with it, the more people can get information. Based on Chris Crawford definition of interactivity, and what I understood about it ( you can look it up on my previous blog about interactivity here), It’s considered as an interactive installation which people can plan their trip around NYC. I think it’s interesting to observe this MTA Trip Planner Installation. I observed and recorded it for about 45 minutes. So, I did my observation in Time Square station (I thought this station was one of the busiest station, didn’t know if it was true though). ![]() I was wondering if people could actually used it, if people were not frustrated enough like I did, even if people would notice it. But then I realized that I needed to do some observations before redesigning it. Since I’m taking Visual Language class, I tried to redesign its interface.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |